Back
RITU BAHRI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL
Ranjana – Appellant
Versus
Satendra Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ritu Bahri, C.J.
Though the respondent has been served twice, none has put in appearance on his behalf.
2. Since the marriage of the parties was solemnized 13.04.2005, there is no child from the marriage and both the parties are living separately since 15.05.2005, the marriage between the parties is a dead marriage in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court.
3. The relevant details are as follows: -
| DATE OF MARRIAGE | 13th April, 2005 |
| DATE OF SEPARATION | 15th May, 2005 |
| DETAILS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE PARTIES | By Wife: 1. Case Crime No. 144/2007 in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Kashipur, under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Act. 2. Case No. 206/2006 in the court of Family Judge Udham Singh Nagar, under section 125 of the CrPC. 3. Criminal Case No. 162/2010 in the court of Judicial Magistrate Kashipur, under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
BY Husband: 1. Criminal Case no. 71/2011 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate/ Civil Judge(Junior Division) Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar, under section 494 of the Indian Penal Code.
|
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
