IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Shivalik College of Engineering through its Secretary - Petitioner
Versus
Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S No. 3619 of 2023
Decided On : 04-06-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for autonomous status seeks compliance with ugc regulations. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. objection to noc based on accreditation is unwarranted. (Para 3 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. ugc regulations established framework for granting autonomy. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. eligibility criteria for autonomous status established. (Para 16 , 70) |
| 5. ugc's authority upheld in granting autonomous status. (Para 24 , 30 , 31 , 33) |
| 6. legal obligations of the ugc regulations. (Para 39) |
| 7. university's refusal of autonomy notification violates ugc's mandate. (Para 63 , 68) |
| 8. decision mandates action from the university. (Para 65) |
| 9. court orders university to issue autonomy notification. (Para 72 , 73) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, which is an Institution namely “Shivalik College of Engineering”, for seeking a direction that respondent No. 1/Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University is directed to issue the necessary Notification regarding grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution pursuant to Regulation 4.2 of the University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status Upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations, 2023 in compliance to the letter issued by the University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as “UGC”) dated 13.11.2023, whereby, the respondent University has been directed to issue the Notification within 30 days regarding grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution.
2. Brief facts are that the petitioner’s Institution run by a Society, namely “Rijan Educational Society”, registered under the Societies Registration Act. The registration of the said society was lastly renewed on 21.09.2020 for the period commencing from 06.06.2020 to 05.06.2025.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Rijan Educational Society is a non profit organisation and its aim & object is to mobilise world class education and generate resources for providing and supporting quality education for all with the vision for a better tomorrow.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s institution i.e. Shivalik College of Engineering, is approved by the AICTE and affiliated with Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University (hereinafter referred to as “the University”). This institution was established in the year 2008 and the approval was accorded by the AICTE on 07.05.2008 to conduct technical courses, the copy of which is also brought on record and thereafter got affiliation with the University on 18.03.2010.
5. The issue, as raised in the instant writ petition is with regard to grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution for which the UGC, after following the complete procedure directed the University to issue the notification for the purposes of grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution, but the University have not issued the notification on the ground that the petitioner’s institution is not having NBA accreditation. Being aggrieved with the inaction on the part of the respondent/University, not issuing the notification as per UGC Regulations, 2023, the instant writ petition has been preferred.
6. Now, since the issue relates to the grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution which though the UGC directed the University to issue notification but the University is not issuing the notification and therefore in backdrop of this case, the references of Regulations, which governs the field for grant of autonomous status, is required to a discuss.
7. The UGC, in supersession of the earlier Regulation of 2018 i.e. University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations, 2018, by invoking the powers as conferred by clause (j) of Section 12 read with clause (f) and (g)
M. Karunanidhi Vs. Union of India
S. Styapal Reddy Vs. Govt. of A.P.
UP Coop Cane Union Fed Vs. West UP Sugar Mills
Visveswaraiah Tech University Vs. Krishnendu Halder
TN Medical Officers Assn. Vs. UOI
Jaiveer Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand
ADM (Rev) Delhi Admn Vs. Siri Ram
AI
The court affirmed that under UGC Regulations, an institution can obtain autonomy with NAAC accreditation, and universities must comply with UGC directives regarding such status.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the guidelines prescribed by the University do not have statutory force and cannot be the sole criterion for rejecting the plea of the petitio....
: Affiliation of University once the application is rejected by the affiliating University, it cannot be decided subsequently either independently or otherwise by the UGC, then the power conferred on....
Universities must issue notifications for autonomy within 30 days per UGC regulations; failure to comply leads to deemed approval for autonomous status.
The Parent University must adhere to UGC Regulations for granting Autonomous Status, with failure to act within specified time leading to a presumption of no objection.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.