SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 98

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Shivalik College of Engineering through its Secretary - Petitioner
Versus
Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S No. 3619 of 2023
Decided On : 04-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary and Mr. Siddharth Sah, learned counsel.
For the Respondents:Mr. Jatinder Sethi, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel, Mrs. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel.

The court affirmed that under UGC Regulations, an institution can obtain autonomy with NAAC accreditation, and universities must comply with UGC directives regarding such status.

Headnote:(A) University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status Upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations, 2023 - The petitioner sought issuance of notification for grant of autonomous status from the University, per UGC's mandate - The University denied it claiming lack of NBA accreditation. However, UGC Regulations permit NAAC accreditation as sufficient eligibility. Under Regulation 4.2, the University must comply within 30 days of UGC's instructions. No substantial grounds for refusal were provided - The court directed the issuance of the notification. (Paras 4, 13, 68-72)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, Shivalik College of Engineering, sought autonomous status from the Uttarakhand Technical University after fulfilling eligibility criteria stated in UGC Regulations. The University refused certification based on alleged lack of NBA accreditation, while the college held NAAC accreditation, which suffices.

Findings of Court:
The court found the University's refusal to issue a notification based solely on a misinterpretation of UGC regulations, thus failing to uphold the mandate issued by the UGC.

Issues: Whether the University was justified in denying the autonomous status based on accreditation requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: Court asserted that UGC regulations were binding, and eligibility criteria allow for NAAC accreditation; hence, the University must adhere to UGC's directive following the approval process.

Result: Writ petition allowed, notification to be issued for autonomous status.

Table of Content
1. petition for autonomous status seeks compliance with ugc regulations. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5)
2. objection to noc based on accreditation is unwarranted. (Para 3 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. ugc regulations established framework for granting autonomy. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
4. eligibility criteria for autonomous status established. (Para 16 , 70)
5. ugc's authority upheld in granting autonomous status. (Para 24 , 30 , 31 , 33)
6. legal obligations of the ugc regulations. (Para 39)
7. university's refusal of autonomy notification violates ugc's mandate. (Para 63 , 68)
8. decision mandates action from the university. (Para 65)
9. court orders university to issue autonomy notification. (Para 72 , 73)

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, which is an Institution namely “Shivalik College of Engineering”, for seeking a direction that respondent No. 1/Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University is directed to issue the necessary Notification regarding grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution pursuant to Regulation 4.2 of the University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status Upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations, 2023 in compliance to the letter issued by the University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as “UGC”) dated 13.11.2023, whereby, the respondent University has been directed to issue the Notification within 30 days regarding grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution.

2. Brief facts are that the petitioner’s Institution run by a Society, namely “Rijan Educational Society”, registered under the Societies Registration Act. The registration of the said society was lastly renewed on 21.09.2020 for the period commencing from 06.06.2020 to 05.06.2025.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Rijan Educational Society is a non profit organisation and its aim & object is to mobilise world class education and generate resources for providing and supporting quality education for all with the vision for a better tomorrow.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s institution i.e. Shivalik College of Engineering, is approved by the AICTE and affiliated with Veer Madho Singh Bhandari Uttarakhand Technical University (hereinafter referred to as “the University”). This institution was established in the year 2008 and the approval was accorded by the AICTE on 07.05.2008 to conduct technical courses, the copy of which is also brought on record and thereafter got affiliation with the University on 18.03.2010.

5. The issue, as raised in the instant writ petition is with regard to grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution for which the UGC, after following the complete procedure directed the University to issue the notification for the purposes of grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution, but the University have not issued the notification on the ground that the petitioner’s institution is not having NBA accreditation. Being aggrieved with the inaction on the part of the respondent/University, not issuing the notification as per UGC Regulations, 2023, the instant writ petition has been preferred.

6. Now, since the issue relates to the grant of autonomous status to the petitioner’s institution which though the UGC directed the University to issue notification but the University is not issuing the notification and therefore in backdrop of this case, the references of Regulations, which governs the field for grant of autonomous status, is required to a discuss.

7. The UGC, in supersession of the earlier Regulation of 2018 i.e. University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations, 2018, by invoking the powers as conferred by clause (j) of Section 12 read with clause (f) and (g)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top