IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT, JJ.
Rudresh Negi - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 308 of 2024
Decided On : 13-06-2024
NOC - Employment - Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 14 - The court upheld the validity of a government order restricting the issuance of No Objection Certificates (NOC) for employment outside the state, emphasizing the employer's prerogative and public interest in maintaining faculty strength in government medical colleges.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Assistant Professor, sought a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to apply for a faculty position outside the state, challenging a government order that limited NOC issuance to applications within the state.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the government order was not arbitrary and served a public interest by ensuring adequate faculty in government medical colleges, which are crucial for providing medical education and services.
Issues: Whether the government order restricting NOC issuance to applications within the state is arbitrary and violates the petitioner's rights.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the issuance of NOC is at the employer's discretion and that the government order was justified in light of the need to maintain faculty strength in government medical colleges.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Petitioner is serving as Assistant Professor (Community Medicine) in Government Medical College, Haldwani. Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University at Varanasi issued an advertisement inviting applications for appointment to various faculty positions.
2. Since petitioner was desirous of applying pursuant to the said advertisement, therefore, he made an application to the Secretary, Medical Education, Government of Uttarakhand for issuance of ‘No Objection Certificate’, which was forwarded by Principal of Government Medical College to Director, Medical Education. Petitioner’s application was returned by the Director asking the Principal of the Medical College to take decision as per Government Order dated 27.08.2020.
3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
“(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature certiorari, quashing the impugned government order no. 712/XXVIII (5)/2020-12 (general)/2020 dated 27-8-2020 issued by respondent no. 1 (Annexure No. 1) to this writ petition).
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding/directing respondents, more particularly, to the respondent no. 1 to provide no objection certificate to the petitioner for attending the interview to be held on 19/20-6-2024 at I.M.S. Banaras Hindu University for the post of Assistant Professor (Community Medicine).”
4. The impugned Government Order dated 27.08.2020 is on record as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. It refers to the proposal submitted by Director, Medical Education for grant of No Objection Certificate (NOC) to teachers of Government Medical Colleges. In para 2 of the said Government Order, it is stated that NOC to teacher of Government Medical Colleges shall be issued by the Principal, if he has applied for appointment in some other Government Medical College within the State. It is mentioned that existing Government Medical Colleges are facing shortage of teachers, and many more colleges are going to be opened by the Government in future, therefore, due to scarcity of qualified persons for appointment to faculty positions, the request for NOC by existing faculty members for seeking employment outside the State may not be forwarded to the State Government.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the condition put by the impugned Government Order that NOC would be given only when a teacher applies for appointment in a Government College within the State, is arbitrary and illegal. He submits that all Medical Colleges form a homogeneous class, therefore, artificial classification made by the impugned Government Order between Government Medical Colleges within State of Uttarakhand vis-a-vis other Medical Colleges is unsustainable and the Government Order deserves to be set aside.
6. Per contra, learned State Counsel submits that challenge to the condition mentioned in Government Order dated 27.08.2020 is without substance. He submits that NOC for seeking employment elsewhere cannot be claimed as of right by an employee and every employer has the right to turn down the request for NOC, if situation so warrants. He submits that freedom of choice available to an employee is not restricted by the impugned Government Order for seeking employment elsewhere, however, employer cannot be compelled to issue NOC to his employee in these matters. He contends that grant of NOC is the sole prerogative of an employer, and if he finds an individual to be indispensable for the institution, then he can turn down the request for NOC without violating any law.
7. This Court finds substance in the submission made by Learned State Counsel. Uttarakhand is a hill State and the Government Medical Colleges within the State are facing scarcity of faculty members. National Medical Commission, which is the regulatory body in the field of Medical Education, has laid down minimum standards regarding strength of faculty members in Medical Colleges and if
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of a representation for NOC must be in compliance with constitutional provisions, and any arbitrary or discriminatory action in ....
Point of Law : Permission to establish a new Ayurveda Medical College - Special powers of State Government in certain circumstances - Provisions of State Act were insufficient to satisfy requirements....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.