SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 87

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, PANKAJ PUROHIT, JJ.
Dinesh Chandra Dimari and Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 312 of 2023
Decided On : 21-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. A.K. Verma and Mr. Girveer Chand, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General, Mr. S.S. Lingwal, Adv..

IMPORTANT POINT
The definition of 'Teacher' under the Uttar Pradesh Act includes those recognized by the university, impacting superannuation benefits.

Headnote:

Superannuation - Employment - Uttar Pradesh (Krishi Evam Prodoyogik Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam), 1958, UGC Order - The court interpreted the definition of 'Teacher' under Section 2(k) and the implications of the Government Order on superannuation age, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioners' entitlement to benefits as recognized teachers.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, appointed as Assistant Professors, challenged orders withdrawing their superannuation benefits, arguing they were recognized as teachers under university statutes despite initial project-based appointments.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were indeed recognized as teachers and entitled to the benefits of increased superannuation age, as per previous judgments and applicable statutes.

Issues: Whether the petitioners, initially appointed under a project, are entitled to the benefits of increased superannuation age as university teachers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the definition of 'Teacher' under the relevant Act includes those recognized as such by the university, thus entitling the petitioners to the benefits of increased superannuation age.

Result: The court quashed the impugned orders and ruled that petitioners are entitled to continue until age 65 with all associated benefits.

JUDGMENT :

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) :

By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:-

    “i. Issue a writ or writs, order or orders, direction and directions particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order being Order. No. 730/XIII-2/202314(02)/2016 dated 04.07.2023 issued by respondent no. respondent no. 1 i.e. order of State Government dated and the Order No. PMS(A)/AEO/7350 dated 06.07.2023 issued by the respondent university and Order No. PMA/CAO/F-30/7376 dated 12.07.2023 passed by the respondent no. 5 (Annexure No. 1 (Colly) to the writ petition).

ii. Issue a writ or writ, order or orders, direction and directions particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to comply the mandate as provided in the Acts and Statutes of the Govind Ballabh Pant Univrsity of Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar particularly under 2(k) of Uttar Pradesh (Krishi Evam Prodoyogik Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam), 1958 and thereafter the Order No.-1-32/2006-U-11/U-L dated 31.12.2008 issued under Section 8(F) passed by UGC and order of the State Government dated 20.09.2013 by which the superannuation age of university Professor have been enhanced from 60 years to 65 years and allow the petitioner to continue their teaching as Professor till the age of 65 years. iii. Issue a writ or writ, order or orders, direction and directions particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to compute the age of superannuation of petitioners at 65 yeas alongwith other retirement benefits viz., Gratuity, leave encashment, pension from treasury etc. from State Government budget.”

2. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology issued Employment Notice No. 1 of 1991, whereby, applications were invited from eligible persons for appointment to different teaching posts. Petitioners participated in the selection process and on the recommendation of Selection Committee constituted as per clause 4(d) of Chapter XIII of the statutes of the University, they were appointed as Assistant Professor by separate orders issued by Chief Personal Officer of the University on 22.10.1991 and 11.11.1992.

3. It is not in dispute that petitioners were initially appointed against posts in National Agricultural Research Project (NARP), however, pursuant to order dated 01.12.1994, they were given salary from the general budget of the University. Services of the petitioners were confirmed thus they acquired status of permanent employee. Up to the year 2001, all petitioners were promoted as Associate Professors and they were promoted as Professor in the year 2008-09. Petitioner No. 1 was appointed Head of Department (Horticulture) in the year 2011 for one year and he was thereafter assigned duties of the post of Joint Director Extension (Horticulture) which he held for three years. Similarly, other petitioners were assigned various administrative positions in the University from time to time.

4. Petitioners are aggrieved by Government Order dated 04.07.2023 and the consequential order dated 12.07.2023 issued by Chief Personal Officer of the University. By these orders, the benefit of increased age of superannuation has been withdrawn from them by holding that they are not the Teachers of the University. Age of superannuation of Teachers was increased from 60 years to 65 years vide Government Order dated 20.09.2013, and benefit of said decision was given to petitioners.

5. A counter affidavit has been filed by Dr. M.S. Negi, Additional Chief Personal Officer on behalf of the University, in which it is admitted that all the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Professors in National Agricultural Research Project (NARP); NARP was a five year project of the World Bank and as per the tripartite agreement entered into between G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Government of Uttar Prades

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top