State of Uttaranchal vs Kamal Singh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 348

PANKAJ PUROHIT
State of Uttaranchal – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Singh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.C. Dumka.
For the Respondent: Sandeep Tandon.

JUDGMENT :

PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.

1. In this appeal preferred by the State under Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), judgment and order dated 25.03.2006, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Dehradun in Sessions Trial No. 208 of 2004 State Vs. Kamal Singh and Others, is under challenge, whereby the said court, at the conclusion of trial, has acquitted the respondents-accused for the charge of offence punishable under Section 304 of IPC.

2. Facts in nutshell are that initially on 14.10.2004, a non-cognizable report (Ext. Ka-1) was given by PW1-Bakshi Chand Rana with police outpost Herbertpur, District Dehradun with the averments that on the last date, he along with his wife had gone to the house of his daughter and called for her. On some issue being argued in the house, his son-in-law and his brothers bent upon to commit maarpeet. His wife is a diabetic patient, who sustained injuries in his house. Thereafter, another report (Ext. Ka-2) was lodged by PW1-Bakshi Chand Rana with the same police outpost stating therein that his daughter-Renu was got married one and a half year ago with accused-Kamal Singh. There were some issues ongoing betwee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document