SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 414

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Smt. Reetu - Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand - Respondent
Bail Application No. 1179 Of 2023 With Bail Application No. 1424 of 2023 With Bail Application No. 1744 of 2023 With Bail Application No. 1972 of 2023
Decided On : 06-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Mr. P.S. Sridhar Raj, Adv., Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Adv., with Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Manisha Bhandari, Special Counsel.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that prolonged detention without trial is unjustified, reinforcing the principle that bail is a right unless specific circumstances warrant denial.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Procedure - Section 439, IPC, Prevention of Corruption Act, Public Examinations Act - The court discussed the provisions of bail under Section 439 of the CrPC, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the right to personal liberty, leading to the decision to grant bail.

Fact of the Case:

Four bail applications were filed for individuals in judicial custody related to a paper leak scam for a government examination, with charges under various sections of the IPC and specific acts.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicants had been in custody for an extended period without trial commencement and that there was no need for further custodial interrogation, thus granting bail.

Issues: Whether the applicants should be granted bail considering the nature of the charges and the duration of their custody.

Ratio Decidendi: Bail is the rule and imprisonment is the exception; the court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and the lack of necessity for continued detention.

Result: The bail applications are allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) :

These four Bail Applications have been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in connection with the Case Crime No. 12 of 2023, registered at police station Kankhal, District Haridwar.

2. The applicant-Smt. Reetu is in judicial custody under Sections 409, 411, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, “IPC”), Section 9, Section 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1998 (in short, “Act, 1998”) (as applicable in the State of Uttarakhand), Section 8 and Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short, “Act, 1988”).

3. The applicant- Sanjeev Prakash Chaturvedi is in judicial custody under Sections 409, 411, 420, 201, 120B IPC, Section 4, Section 5, Section 7, Section 10 of the Act, 1998, Section 7 and Section 13 of the Act, 1988.

4. The applicant- Sanjay Dhariwal is in judicial custody under Sections 409, 411, 420, 120B IPC, Section 9, Section 10 of the Act, 1998, Section 8 and Section 12 of the Act, 1988.

5. The applicant-Pramod Kumar Chauhan is in judicial custody under Sections 409, 420, 120B IPC, Section 3, Section 4, Section 9, Section 10 of the Act, 1998, Section 8 and Section 12 of the Act, 1988.

6. All these four Bail Applications have arisen from one case crime number i.e. Case Crime No. 12 of 2023, therefore, these four Bail Applications are being considered and decided by this common order. The file of the Bail Application No. 1179 of 2023 is leading file.

7. In brief, the prosecution’s case is that on 12.01.2023, Mr. Pradeep Singh Rana, the Inspector, received an information that several persons were involved in a scam related to paper leak for the post of Patwari/Lekhpal. The examinations for the post of Patwari/Lekhpal were conducted by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission on 08.01.2023. According to the First Information Report dated 12.01.2023, co-accused Rajpal Singh along with co-accused Sanjeev Kumar leaked the paper and sold to the candidates and received money from them. The First Information Report was registered against the applicants, Sanjeev Kumar Chaturvedi, Smt. Reetu and Pramod Kumar Chauhan and four other co-accused persons.

8. During the course of the investigation, it was found that on 05.01.2023, Smt. Reetu, the applicant and the applicant-Sanjeev Prakash Chaturvedi, the husband of Smt. Reetu, along with other co-accused persons went from Khanpur, District Haridwar to Delhi. Thereafter, Smt. Reetu along with other co-accused persons and six candidates went to a flat situated at Madhur Vihar, Dwarika, South Delhi, where, the said candidates were shown the question papers of the aforesaid examinations. The said locations of the applicant-Smt. Reetu are supported by her mobile phone details. During the course of the investigation, the names of the applicant-Pramod Kumar Chauhan and applicant-Sanjay Dhariwal came into light and from their possession leaked examination papers, heavy amount of cash, blank cheques, issued by candidates, were recovered.

9. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present matter. They are innocent persons. All the allegations made against them are false, which the prosecution has to prove during the trial itself. Co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court. Applicants are not previous convicts. The charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

10. On the other hand, Ms. Manisha Bhandari, learned Special Counsel for the State, has opposed the bail applications. However, she has conceded that charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogations.

11. Applicants, Smt. Reetu, Sanjeev Prakash Chaturvedi and Sanjay Dhariwal, are the residents of District Haridwar, and, the applicant-Pramod Kumar Chauhan is a

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top