SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
Jagdish Chand - Revisionist
Versus
State of Uttarakhand - Respondent
Criminal Revision No.542 of 2024
Decided On : 13-11-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Mr. K.K. Harbola.
For the State : Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, AGA.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court upheld the conviction for negligent driving but modified the sentence to time already served, emphasizing the nature of the offense.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 279, 337, 338, 427 - Conviction and sentencing of the revisionist for causing injuries in a vehicular accident - The revisionist was convicted and sentenced to simple imprisonment and fines for various offenses related to negligent driving - The conviction was upheld in appeal. (Paras 1-2, 14-15)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Examination of the accused - The revisionist denied the charges and claimed false implication during his examination. (Paras 5, 10)

Facts of the case:

The revisionist was convicted for causing injuries to passengers of an e-rickshaw after colliding with it while driving a tractor on 11.03.2019. (Paras 4, 6)

Findings of Court:

The conviction under IPC sections was upheld, but the sentence was modified to reflect time already served. (Paras 14-15)

Issues: The main issue was whether the revisionist's actions constituted negligence leading to the accident. (Paras 10, 13)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the nature of the offense warranted a modification of the sentence to time served, while upholding the conviction. (Paras 13-15)

Result: Revision partly allowed; sentence modified.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

The challenge in this revision is made to the judgment and order dated 28.02.2022, passed in Criminal Case No.586 of 2019, State vs. Jagdish Chand, by the court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Tanakpur, District Champawat (“the case”), by which, the revisionist has been convicted under Sections 279, 337, 338, 427 IPC and has been sentenced as follows:-

    (i) Under Section 279 IPC - to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months with a fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for further period of one month.

(ii) Under Section 337 IPC - to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months with a fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for further period of one month.

(iii) Under Section 338 IPC - to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months with a fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for further period of one month.

(iv) Under Section 427 IPC - to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months with a fine of Rs.5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for further period of one month.

2. The challenge is also made to the judgment and order dated 13.06.2024, passed in Criminal Appeal No.03 of 2022, Jagdish Chandra v. State, by the Sessions Judge, Champawat, District Champawat (“the appeal”), by which, the appeal has been dismissed and the judgment and order passed in the case has been affirmed.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. The case is based on an FIR, lodged by PW1 Dinesh Kumar, according to which on 11.03.2019 at 10:45 in the morning, the applicant while driving Tractor No.UK03CA 1352 (“the tractor”) hit the Tuktuk (“e-rickshaw”) driven by PW2 Pappu, due to which, many passengers of e-rickshaw sustained injuries. Based on this FIR, Case Crime No.32 of 2019, under Sections 279, 337, 338, 427 IPC was registered against the revisionist at Police Station Tanakpur, District Champawat. Investigation was carried out and the Investigating Officer, after investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the revisionist under 279, 337, 338, 427 IPC, which is the basis of the case. The revisionist was read over the accusation against him, to which, he denied and claimed trial.

5. In order to prove its case, the prosecution examined in as many as eleven witnesses namely, PW1 Dinesh Kumar, PW2 Pappu, PW3 Rajendra Prasad Joshi, PW4 Heera Ballabh Joshi, PW5 Nanhe Lal, PW6 Parwati Devi, PW7 Dr. Aaftab Alam, Medical Officer, PW8 Dr. Akram Mansuri, Dentist, PW9 HCMT Devi Dutt Joshi, who inspected the accidental vehicle, PW10 Retired SI Kedar Dutt, Investigating Officer and PW11 Lady Constable 34 C.P. Bindeshwari Rana. After prosecution evidence, the revisionist was examined under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. According to him, he has been falsely implicated.

6. After hearing the parties, by the impugned judgment and order passed in the case, the revisionist has been convicted and sentenced, as stated hereinbefore. The conviction and sentence, as passed in the case has been confirmed in the appeal.

7. In the instant case, PW1 Dinesh Kumar is the informant. PW2 Pappu is the driver of the e-rickshaw, who has stated that on the date of incident the tractor hit his vehicle from front side, due to which, he and other passengers sustained injuries. PW3 Rajendra Prasad, PW4 Heera Ballabh, and PW6 Parwati Devi were passengers of the vehicle. They have also stated that about the accident. According to PW3 Rajendra Singh Bisht, the e-rickshaw was hit by the back side of the trolley of the tractor. PW5 Nanhe Lal, is an eye-witness of the incident.

8. PW7 Dr. Aftab Alam has examined the injured. He has proved his reports. PW8 Dr. Akram Mansuri is a Dentist. He has also stated about the treatment given to the injured. PW9 is HCMT Devi Dutt Joshi. He had inspected the vehicle involved in the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top