IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, ACJ., Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.
Ravindra Jugran & another - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) NO. 84 OF 2021
Decided On : 04-11-2024
Central Universities Act, 2009 - UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges, 2018 - Appointment of Vice Chancellor - Petitioners challenged the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor on grounds of illegality and non-compliance with advertisement requirements - The court found that the UGC Regulations permit selection by nomination, allowing for candidates who did not apply to be considered - The appointment was deemed valid as there were no allegations of disqualification against the respondent. (Paras 4, 12, 13)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners questioned the legality of the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor of HNB Garhwal University, arguing she did not apply for the position as per the advertisement dated 30.01.2018.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the appointment, stating that the UGC Regulations allow for selection through nomination, which was appropriately followed in this case.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appointment of respondent No.4 was valid despite her not applying for the position as advertised.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the UGC Regulations permit the Search-cum-Selection Committee to adopt nomination methods for selecting candidates, thus validating the appointment of respondent No.4.
Result: The writ petition was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, ACJ.
In this writ petition, allegedly filed in public interest, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:-
ii. Issue writ rule or direction in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus declaring the Screening Committee constituted for the appointment of the Vice Chancellor, HNB University so far as empowering the alleged committee mentioned in Central Universities Act to recommend the name of three persons for the appointment of Vice Chancellor section with along with all consequential acts or orders and proposed actions as ultra- vires, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, contrary to the provisions of the UGC and to quash the same, after calling the entire records from the respondents along with its effect and operation also, or to mould the relief appropriately, keeping in view the facts highlighted in the body of the writ petition.
iii. Issue writ rule or direction appropriate in nature against the Ministry of Education and University Grant Commission for its inaction in respect of violation of provisions of Central Universities Act and UGC regulations by the Central Government in the manner of appointment of Vice Chancellor and other authorities of the universities as well as faculty, so the UGC authorities and Ministry of Education authorities cannot escape from their legal obligations, keeping in view the provisions of Central Universities Act and regulations and further to direct the respondent no.3 to bring on record the entire service records of the respondent no.4 to find out the truth and further restrain the private respondent no.4 to exercise financial and administrative powers which is available to the Vice Chancellor.
iv. Issue any other writ rule or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in circumstances of the case including for setting up enquiry against the erring officer and to take appropriate action against the same.”
2. In sum and substance, petitioners have questioned selection and appointment of respondent no.4 as Vice Chancellor of Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar (for short “HNB GU”) on the ground that she had not even applied pursuant to the advertisement dated 30.01.2018, issued by Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, yet she was appointed as Vice Chancellor for a term of five years w.e.f. 31.10.2019.
3. It is not in dispute that term of respondent no.4 as Vice Chancellor of HNB GU came to an end on 31.10.2024.
4. Respondent No.1- Union of India has placed reliance upon provision contained in Clause 7.3 (ii) of the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018, which reads as under:-
The UGC Regulations allow for the nomination method in appointing a Vice Chancellor, validating appointments even if candidates did not respond to advertisements.
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – While preparing panel, Search Committee must give proper weightage to academic excellence; exposure to higher education system in country and abroad, an....
It is trite and settled law that a writ of quo warranto can be issued in the case of appointment of like nature which is contrary to the statute.
Reappointment of Vice Chancellor without fresh selection is valid unless specified; initial appointment void for UGC non-compliance.
The court upheld that the appointment process followed statutory provisions, and the involvement of the Minister did not invalidate the appointment, establishing judicial review limits in administrat....
The appointment of Vice-Chancellors must comply with statutory provisions and UGC regulations, ensuring lawful and independent decision-making by the Chancellor.
The appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of a University must be made in accordance with the UGC Regulations, 2010, which are mandatory and binding on the State Government. A person who is connected wi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.