SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 626

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, ACJ., Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.
Ravindra Jugran & another - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) NO. 84 OF 2021
Decided On : 04-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.C. Pant and Mr. Anurag Tiwary, learned counsels
For the Respondent: Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, learned Standing Counsel, Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel, Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel, Ms. Irum Zeba, learned counsel

IMPORTANT POINT
The UGC Regulations allow for the nomination method in appointing a Vice Chancellor, validating appointments even if candidates did not respond to advertisements.

Headnote:

Central Universities Act, 2009 - UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges, 2018 - Appointment of Vice Chancellor - Petitioners challenged the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor on grounds of illegality and non-compliance with advertisement requirements - The court found that the UGC Regulations permit selection by nomination, allowing for candidates who did not apply to be considered - The appointment was deemed valid as there were no allegations of disqualification against the respondent. (Paras 4, 12, 13)

Facts of the case:

Petitioners questioned the legality of the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor of HNB Garhwal University, arguing she did not apply for the position as per the advertisement dated 30.01.2018.

Findings of Court:

The court upheld the appointment, stating that the UGC Regulations allow for selection through nomination, which was appropriately followed in this case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appointment of respondent No.4 was valid despite her not applying for the position as advertised.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the UGC Regulations permit the Search-cum-Selection Committee to adopt nomination methods for selecting candidates, thus validating the appointment of respondent No.4.

Result: The writ petition was dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, ACJ.

In this writ petition, allegedly filed in public interest, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:-

    “i. Issue writ rule or direction in the nature of declaration, or quo-warranto against respondent No.4 showing her authority to continue as Vice Chancellor of the HNB Central University, Srinagar and to remove her forthwith from the post of Vice Chancellor and declare her appointment as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the statuary provisions as per Central University Act and based on fraud and every action or decision taken by her be declared as avoid, ab initio, illegal and nullity with all consequential effect keeping in view the facts highlighted in the body of petition after calling the entire record from the respondents along with its effect and operation also.

ii. Issue writ rule or direction in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus declaring the Screening Committee constituted for the appointment of the Vice Chancellor, HNB University so far as empowering the alleged committee mentioned in Central Universities Act to recommend the name of three persons for the appointment of Vice Chancellor section with along with all consequential acts or orders and proposed actions as ultra- vires, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, contrary to the provisions of the UGC and to quash the same, after calling the entire records from the respondents along with its effect and operation also, or to mould the relief appropriately, keeping in view the facts highlighted in the body of the writ petition.

iii. Issue writ rule or direction appropriate in nature against the Ministry of Education and University Grant Commission for its inaction in respect of violation of provisions of Central Universities Act and UGC regulations by the Central Government in the manner of appointment of Vice Chancellor and other authorities of the universities as well as faculty, so the UGC authorities and Ministry of Education authorities cannot escape from their legal obligations, keeping in view the provisions of Central Universities Act and regulations and further to direct the respondent no.3 to bring on record the entire service records of the respondent no.4 to find out the truth and further restrain the private respondent no.4 to exercise financial and administrative powers which is available to the Vice Chancellor.

iv. Issue any other writ rule or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in circumstances of the case including for setting up enquiry against the erring officer and to take appropriate action against the same.”

2. In sum and substance, petitioners have questioned selection and appointment of respondent no.4 as Vice Chancellor of Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar (for short “HNB GU”) on the ground that she had not even applied pursuant to the advertisement dated 30.01.2018, issued by Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, yet she was appointed as Vice Chancellor for a term of five years w.e.f. 31.10.2019.

3. It is not in dispute that term of respondent no.4 as Vice Chancellor of HNB GU came to an end on 31.10.2024.

4. Respondent No.1- Union of India has placed reliance upon provision contained in Clause 7.3 (ii) of the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018, which reads as under:-

    “7.3(ii) The selection for the post of Vice- Chancellor should be through proper identification by a Panel of 3-5 persons by a Search-cum-Selection-Committee, through a public notification or nomination or a talent search process or a combination thereof. The members of such Search-cum-Selection Committee shall be persons’ of eminence in the sphere of higher education and shall not be connected in any manner with the University concerned or its colleges. While preparing th

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top