SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Ajay Kumar Baghel – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ratnesh Kumar Rawat Advocate, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anant Pratap Singh, the learned AGA for the State, Sri Saurabh Mishra, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record.
2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the applicant has sought quashing of Charge Sheet No. 1 of 2022 dated 30.09.2022 for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 & 506 I.P.C. submitted in furtherance of F.I.R. No. 440 of 2022, Police Station Sushant Golf City, Lucknow, summoning order dated 02.12.2022 as well as the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 117643 of 2022, State vs. Ajay Baghel, pending before the Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow.
3. The opposite party no. 2 has filed a counter affidavit which is taken on record.
4. The learned AGA states that the dispute is between the opposite party no. 2 and the applicant, which is private in nature and as the opposite party no. 2 has filed a counter affidavit, the State does not propose to file a separate counter affidavit. With the consent of all the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the Court proceeds to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.