Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, SIDDHARTHA SAH
Vinishma Technologies – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Women Empowerment And Child Development Department – Respondent
Judgment :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
1. Directorate of Women Empowerment and Child Development, Uttarakhand invited bids for supply of Educational School Kits by issuing a notice inviting tender dated 18.12.2025. Petitioner submitted bid pursuant to said notice, as is apparent from averments made in para 11 and 13 of the writ petition.
2. Petitioner apprehends that his bid may be rejected due to certain conditions mentioned in the bid document, therefore, he has approached this Court, seeking the following relief:-
(i) A writ order, order direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned clause 1(Ga) and 1 (Da) of the additional terms and conditions of bid document bearing no. GEM/2025/B7019467 dated 18.12.2025 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) as well as the condition no. 2(4) of the corrigendum dated 29.12.2025 (Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition) issued by the Directorate of Women Empowerment and Child Development Department.
3. Petitioner has challenged Clause 1 ¼x½ and 1 ¼M-½ of the additional terms and conditions of the bid x document. Clause 1¼x½ requires every bidder to submit an affidavit that he is not black listed by any Agency/Central or State Government and; fu
Tender conditions upheld as reasonable for bidder integrity, safety and compliance; judicial review in contracts limited to arbitrariness, mala fides or public interest, with deference to administrat....
Judicial review of tender conditions is limited; courts should not interfere unless actions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide, ensuring public interest is prioritized.
Judicial review of tender conditions is restricted to cases of arbitrariness or unreasonableness, reinforcing that the authority determining eligibility criteria has the discretion and expertise in c....
The formulation of tender conditions falls within the administrative domain of the authority, and judicial review is limited to preventing arbitrariness or favoritism. The courts cannot interfere wit....
Point of law: powers of judicial review are limited and while exercising such power the Court has to see whether the process adopted or decision made by the authority is malafideor is intended to fav....
The court affirmed that tender conditions set by authorities are subject to limited judicial review, focusing on their reasonableness and adherence to statutory provisions.
Court upheld tender criteria requiring specific experience, emphasizing public interest and the rationality of conditions set by the state authority.
District Collector is not empowered to consider the aspect of alteration of any route or alignment except to remove difficulties faced by the licensee. As a result of this, even the request of altern....
The court affirmed that stringent eligibility criteria in public tender processes cannot violate statutory relaxations for Start-ups, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
