SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(MP) 261

M.HIDAYATULLAH
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
HIRALAL SUTWALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C.HARSHE, H.L.KHASKALAM, P.C.Chaturvedi, RAJINDRA SINGH

M. HIDAYATULLAH, C. J.

( 1 ) THE order in this case shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Revisions Nos. 403 and 407 of 1957.

( 2 ) CRIMINAL Revisions Nos. 402 and 403 of 1957 are references under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad, in two cases pending for trial in the criminal court below. Criminal Revision No. 407 of 1957 has been filed by one of the accused Hiralal Sutwala in whose favour also there is the reference in Criminal Revision No. 402 of 1957. As regards the last revision (Criminal Revision No. 407 of 1957), it is sufficient to say that Shri chaturvedi of Allahabad, the learned counsel for Hiralal Sutwala did not press it. In view of this, the revision will have to be dismissed. I order accordingly.

( 3 ) THE other two revisions, as has been stated above, involve consideration of a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad, in which he has recommended the quashing of the charges framed against the accused who are shown as non-applicants in the two revisions. The facts of the case are as follows: on the 29th November, 1948 the accused, who are the non-applicants, were alleged to be travell




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top