SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 82

B. K. MUKHERJEE, M. C. MAHAJAN, N. H. BHAGWATI, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Jagamandar Das – Respondent


Advocates:
A.C.Dave, C.P.LAL, J.B.DADACHAN

Judgment

MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, C.J.I. : This is an appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment in Criminal Revision No. 981 of 1950 by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad quashing the proceedings taken against the respondents under Section 120-B, I.P.C. read with Rules 81(4) and 121 of the Defence of India Rules and ordering their discharge.

2. It was alleged by the prosecution that the respondents infringed the provisions of Section 2 of the Non-Ferrous Metal Control Order, 1942, during the years 1943-1945 and thus committed an offence punishable under the above provisions of the law. No prosecution however was commenced against them till the 16th January 1950 in spite of the fact that a complaint against them had been made to the police in August 1948.

There is no satisfactory explanation for this long delay in putting the chalan in Court and for the leisurely conduct of the investigation which concerned the provisions of an Act which it was known to all concerned had an uncertain life. It is a matter of regret that offences of a serious character should go unpunished simply because of the dilatory methods of the investigation agency.

3. On the 19th April 1950 the r

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top