SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(MP) 364

T.P.NAIK, T.C.SHRIVASTAVA
GURU NARAYANPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
PT. KEDARNATH VISHWESHWARPRASADJI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.SAFI, A.P.SEN, G.P.SINGH, H.L.KHASKALAM, L.S.BAGHEL

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment governs the disposal of two other First Appeals (Nos. 242 and 251, both of 1956) also. These three appeals have been filed by the defendants against the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Rewa, decreeing the claim of the respondent for recovery of amounts due on mortgage deeds executed by the appellants.

( 2 ) THE facts in all these cases are no longer in dispute. The appellants had executed the mortgage deeds for consideration in the years 1944 or 1945 in favour of the respondent. The mortgages were with possession and the property consisted of jagir villages in Vindhya Pradesh. On 1-7-1953 the jagirs were resumed under the Vindhya Pradesh Abolition of Jagirs and Land Reforms Act, 1952 (No. XI of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as the 'abolition Act') and the villages vested in the ?state Government. The respondent's case was that on the vesting, the mortgagors became liable personally for payment of the mortgage debt and accordingly he claimed the amount from them. The appellants in all these cases pleaded that under the provisions of the Abolition Act, the liability to pay the debt passed to the State Government and in no case were the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top