P.K.TARE
LALCHAND RAMCHAND JAIN – Appellant
Versus
KANHAIYALAL RAMBHAROSE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS reference by my learned brother Tare, J. arises out of an appeal by the judgment-debtor against an order passed by the Additional District Judge, Panna, in execution proceedings of a decree. The decree under execution was drawn up on 26th October 1956 consequent to the orders pronounced by the Judicial Commissioner, Vindhya Pradesh, on 23rd December 1955 in a miscellaneous civil appeal and a civil revision. When the decree-holder filed an application for execution for recovery of costs awarded by the Judicial Commissioner the judgment-debtor-appellant raised the objection that the application was barred by time under Article 182 of the Limitation Act as it had been filed more than three years after the date of the delivery of the order viz. 23rd December 1955. This objection was overruled by the executing court which held that as the decree in the appeal was framed and signed on 26th October 1956 and the costs were taxed in the revision petition on 20th October 1956, limitation would start from these dates, and the execution application was thus within time. The judgment-debtor then appealed to this Court.
( 2 ) WHEN the appeal came up for hearing before my
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.