SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(MP) 65

K.L.PANDEY, P.V.DIXIT
SHYAM BEHARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.L.KHASKALAM, P.R.Padhye, P.S.KHIRVADKAR, R.S.DABIR

DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Article 226 of the Constitution is for the issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing two notifications dated 8th July 1960, and 3rd December 1960 issued by the State under sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the acquisition of certain lands belonging to the petitioners and for the issue of a direction to the respondents forbearing them from exercising any rights over those lands,

( 2 ) IT is necessary to state the facts in some detail in order to reach and appreciate the questions to be determined. The petitioners are the owners of land admeasuring 17. 82 acres in Mouza Chhaparwah (Settlement No. 245) in Katni tahsil of Jabalpur District. The respondent No. 4 is a private limited company known as the Premier Refractories of India which proposes to manufacture fireclay bricks, high alumina bricks etc. On 26th April 1960 the said respondent addressed a letter to the Collector, Jabalpur, saying inter alia that the Government of India had sanctioned the installation by the said company of a refractory factory at Katni for the manufactures of fire-clay and high alumina bricks which were not being manufactured in India; that t






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top