SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(MP) 55

P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
DWARKA PRASAD MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
KAMALNARAIN SHARMA – Respondent


DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the question for consideration arises, upon what the Election Tribunal, Raipur, determined in regard to a preliminary objection of the petitioner to the election petition filed by the respondent No. 1 challenging the petitioner's election to the State Legislative assembly from Kasdol constituency.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are these. The petitioner was duly etected to the M. P. State legislative Assembly at a bye-election held in May rg63 from Kasdol constituency. The respondent No. 1, who was defeated at the election, filed an election petition praying that the petitioner's election be declared void as the petitioner was guilty inter alia of having committed certain corrupt practices enumerated in the petition. To support the allegations of corrupt practices and the particulars thereof the respondent No. 1 filed an 'affidavit' along with the election petition. In his reply to the petition, the. applicant raised the preliminary objection that the proviso to section 83 (1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) required that if allegations of any corrupt































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top