K.K.DUBE, A.P.SEN
RAMANIWAS SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SHEOMANGAL PRASAD – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent by the plaintiff is directed against a judgment of Bishambhar Dayal, C. J. , dated 14-4-1971, affirming the judgment and decree of the 2nd Addl. District Judge, Satna, dated 11-11-1965, setting aside the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Class II, Satna, dated 17-4-1961, and dismissing the plaintiff's suit based on title for possession, of sir lands bearing khasra No. 332, area 11-64 acres, and khasra No. 551, area 0. 60 acre, total area 12. 24 acres, situate in village Dengrahat.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff, Lal Rangnath Singh was the ex-Jagirdar of Dengrahat in the erstwhile State of Vindhya Pradesh. He created a usufructuary mortgage of the suit lands by executing a registered mortgage-deed, dated 10-5-1951, in favour of the defendant, Sheo Mangal Prasad, to secure a loan of Rs. 1. 800. The Jagir was resumed by the then State Government of Vindhya Pradesh under the provisions of the Vindhya Pradesh Abolition of Jagirs and Land Reforms Act, 1952, w. e. f 1-1-1954. By virtue of Section 6 (1) (a) of the Act, as from the date of resumption, the right, title and interest of the plaintiff in the Jagir lands stood re
Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan
humansingh Sandersingh v. Dhansingh
Rao Bhupendra Singh v. Smt. Gopal Kunwar Umath
Dhulabhai v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1969 SC 78; Harishchandra Behra v. Garbhoo Singh
Guruprasad Matadin Shukla v. Pritam Madhosingh
REFERRED TO : Narayanprasad v. Pt. Kedarnath Vishweshwarprasadji
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.