( 1 ) I was anxious to dispose of this matter finally to-day as a very short point indeed concerning jurisdictional competence of trial Court to entertain the suit filed in the year 1983 is involved. Because respondents' counsel, Shri R. D. Jain, has urged strenuously that I should first consider and dispose of today only the question of conversion of the instant petition under Sec. 115, CPC into one under Art. 227 of the Constitution, the matter has remained again part-heard.

( 2 ) THE application filed by the petitioner's counsel in this matter is I. A. No. 1125/86, I which was not traceable on the last date as the application did not carry correct particulars of the instant revision. Happily the same is traced out and is placed on record to-day. Shri Jain had prayed a week's time on the last date to file reply to the application and he has renewed the prayer to-day. I am not at all inclined to consider the prayer as I have no hesitation to hold at once that the question of law does not need any investigation of facts. The short ground on which conversion is urged is that the question agitated in the instant revision petition concerns jurisdictional competence of t