SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(MP) 274

V.D.GYANI
MUKESH – Appellant
Versus
DEONARAYAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.JAIN, R.C.VAGHMARE, S.D.SANGHI

V. D. GYANI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Miscellaneous appeal arises out of order dt. 12-2-1986, refusing ad interim injunction as prayed for by the plaintiff-appellant restraining defendant-respondent 1 from transferring his 1/9th share in the suit land to defendant 10 and restraining defendant-respondents 2 to 9 from consenting to any such transfer or parting with its possession or altering the situation of the suit land as it existed on the date of the suit, seeking further injunction to restrain the defendant 10 from altering or changing or making construction on the 1/9th share of the land agreed to be sold to the plaintiff and also praying for a direction to maintain the status quo.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that the plaintiff-appellant, who is a minor, through his natural guardian the mother, Laxmibai, filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement dt. 14-12-1982, entered into by defendant 1 to sell the 1/9th share of the suit land, bearing survey No. 3842, situated in Kasba Ujjain, for Rs. 35,000/- out of which Rs. 4000/- were paid by the plaintiff appellant as earnest money. The other co-sharers, defendants 2 to 9 also consented to this agreement by signing the same. One




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top