N.D.OJHA, C.P.SEN
MONJI KALYANJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners are doing business of grain and of manufacturing Dal at Vidisha. By this writ petition they have challenged the imposition of terminal tax by the Municipal Committee, Vidisha. A copy of the relevant notification where by this tax has been levied and which has been published in Part 2 of the Madhya Pradesh Rajpatra dt. 10th Aug. 1984 has been attached as Annexure-B to the writ petition. It indicates that tax on export of various kinds of food grains and oil-seeds from within the limits of Municipal Committee, Vidisha, has been levied at rates mentioned in the said notification. The said tax has been levied under S. 127 (1) (xvi) of the M. P. Municipalities Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which contemplates a terminal tax on goods or animals imported into or exported from the limits of the municipality.
( 2 ) IT has been urged by learned counsel for the petitioners that Cl. (xvi) of Sub-Sec. (1) of S. 127 of the Act was ultra vires inasmuch as it was not covered by any entry either in List II or in List III of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. According to counsel for the petitioners, terminal tax could be levied only by
FOLLOWED ON : Man Mohan Tuli v. Delhi Municipality
Bangalore Woollen, Cotton and Silk Mills Co. Ltd. Bangalore
Empress Mills v. Municipal Committee Wardha
Distinguished : Arjunsingh v. Teekchand
REFERRED TO : Vrajlal Manilal and Co. v. State of M. P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.