SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 199

V.D.GYANI, A.G.QURESHI
M/s. BADRILAL JODHRAJ AND SONS. – Appellant
Versus
GIRDHARILAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Joshi

V. D. GYANI, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the orders, Annexures-2 and 3, passed by the District Judge, Indore (respondent No. 2) in Civil Revision No. 15 of 1985.

( 2 ) SHORT facts necessary for disposal of this petition are that the petitioner-firm filed Civil Suit No. 55-B of 1981, in the Court of VI Civil Judge, Class II, Indore against respondent 1 for recovery of Rs. 2860/- on the basis of a promissory note, executed by respondent 1. This suit was dismissed by the trial Court, vide its judgement and decree dt. 3-8-1984, holding that the promissory note in question was without consideration. The petitioner preferred an appeal, which was registered as Civil Regular Appeal No. 5-B of 1985. This appeal came to be heard by Shri S. K. Pandey, Addl. Judge to the Court of District Judge, Indore, who by his judgement and decree dt. 11-4-1985 allowed the appeal and decreed the petitioner's claim. This judgement and decree has been filed as Annexure-I to this petition. Respondent 1 preferred a Civil Revision (C. R. No. 15 of 1985) under S. 115, CPC before the District Judge, Indore. The petitioner objected to the very ma














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top