S.N.AWASTHI
SHYAM SUNDER – Appellant
Versus
HUDIBAI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs' second appeal.
( 2 ) THE plaintiffs' suit for possession of 8 survey numbers mentioned in the plaint and for account has been dismissed by the trial Court as well as by the first appellate Court. Hence this second appeal. 2-A. Anandi Prasad and Ranjit Singh were tenants of survey numbers mentioned in the plaint. They granted a Patta to defendants 1, 2 and 3 who were members of joint Hindu family. The question involved in this suit is : whether the Patta creates sub-tenancy in favour of the defendants. The plaintiffs' contention is that it was not sub-lease but merely a partnership. Hence sub-tenancy was not created.
( 3 ) THE Zamindari in Madhya Bharat was abolished on 2-10-1951. The defendants made application before the revenue authorities, on 27-4-1953 stating therein that tenancy right has been acquired by them under S. 38 of that Act. The plaintiffs' case is that there had been a partition between Anandi Prasad and Ranjit Singh. The name of Anandi Prasad was mutated in the revenue records on 19-3-1948. The suit lands fell to the share of Anandi Prasad, who alleged himself to be a disabled person entitled to lease his land. On 12-11-19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.