SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 116

S.K.DUBEY
SHIVSAHAY – Appellant
Versus
NANDLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.K.PATIDAR, K.L.GOEL

S. K. DUBEY, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the order dt. 4-4-84, in Civil Suit No. 9b/81, passed by the Additional Judge to the Court of Distt. Judge, Mandsaur/neemuch, whereby the prayer of the plaintiff/applicant for examination of himself and one witness, and for amendment in relief clause against defendant No. 4 was disallowed, the plaintiff has presented this revision.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 18,993/- on 2-4-1976 against the defendants, but in relief clause the decree was prayed against the defendants 1 to 3 only. The defendants 1 to 4, denied the claim of the plaintiff and the suit is being contested on various grounds. On 11-11-1982, as the plaintiff was ill and was admitted in hospital at Jaipur, son of the plaintiff examined himself and closed the evidence. The defendants 1 to 3 also produced their evidence and therefore, the case was posted for arguments on 4-4-84. ( 3 ) ON 4-4-1984, the plaintiff filed two applications one u/o. 18, R. 17, Civil P. C. , for allowing permission to examine the plaintiff and one witness Nandlal. Another application was filed under O. 6, R. 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure whereby an amendment in relief clause was sought







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top