S.K.DUBEY
SOBHAGYAMAL – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH PHARMACEUTICALS, INDORE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision under S. 23-E of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short, the 'act') has been preferred by the landlord/ petitioner, aggrieved of the order dated 26-8-1987, passed in Case No. 90 (7) 110/ 85-86 by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore (for short, the 'rent Controller'), whereby the application under S. 23-A (b) of the Act for eviction of the tenant/ respondent from the non-residential accommodation, has been dismissed.
( 2 ) THE circumstances giving rise to this revision are: The petitioner/ landlord filed an application under S. 23-A (b) of the Act for invoking the special jurisdiction conferred on the Rent Controller under Chapter III-A on the ground that the petitioner is a retired servant of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (for short, the 'corporation') who falls within the definition of landlord for the purposes of Chapter III-A, as specified in S. 23-J of the Act. After service of summons, the respondent/ tenant raised a jurisdictional objection; that neither the petitioner is a retired Government servant, nor is a retired servant of a Company owned or controlled either by the Central or State Government; therefore, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.