SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 180

S.P.SRIVASTAVA, R.B.DIXIT
KISHAN SINGH AHLUWALIA – Appellant
Versus
SHEELA SAXENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.D.Gupta, H.K.SHUKLA, K.L.MANGAL, M.M.Kaushik

R. B. DIXIT, J.

( 1 ) THE subject matter in this Letters Patent Appeal arises out of the Probate proceedings numbered as Probate Case No. 71/87, whereunder, respondent Smt. Sheela Saxena had filed an application dated 14-2-1987. Under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act praying for issue of letter of Administration annexed with the Will dated 4-6-1987, claimed to have been executed by Smt. Rajendra Kaur alias Harisharan aged about 85 years in her favour and in favour of Naveen Kumar, her son as well as Balbir Baba, her sister, Smt. Rajendra Kaur, the testatrix had died on 25-6-1987.

( 2 ) THE learned trial Court by order dated 25-6-90 allowed the application and granted letter of Administration in favour of Smt. Sheela Saxena. However, in Misce. Appeal No. 102/90, preferred by another daughter of testatrix Shakuntala Jhamb, the order Dt. 25-9-96, was set aside with the direction of remanding the matter back to the Court below providing however, that before rehearing the matter, other heirs of Rajinder Kaur who are indicated hereinabove, shall be noticed and they shall also be heard. When objections are filed afresh, if any, on that and also on objections already on record, the















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top