DEEPAK VERMA, S.K.SETH
DINESHKUMAR SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
NEETA – Respondent
( 1 ) NOTICING diametrical opposite views taken by co-ordinate benches learned single Judge has referred the following question to resolve the conflict of views. "whether the Court is required to wait for a period of 6 months u/s. 13-B of the hindu Marriage Act when a joint petition for divorce is filed in a pending case instituted u/s. 13 (1) of the Act and which has been pending for more than 6 months ?"
( 2 ) FACTS lies in a narrow compass. On 26-11-1987, marriage between applicant and respondent was performed as per Hindu rites. Out of wedlock, one daughter-Prachi was born on 24-11-1988. It appears that relations between the parties instead of ripening into mutual love and affection for each other, soured and applicant and respondent were unable to enjoy the bliss of happy married life for long. On 8-1-1996, applicant filed petition u/s. 13 (1) in the Court below seeking divorce and dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion. Although respondent wife resisted the petition but all efforts made by the Court below for reconciliation were in vain. During the pendency of petition for divorce, on 1-9-1998 both husband and wife made a joint petiion u/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.