SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 169

S.P.KHARE
KAMALVASINI AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
R. D. AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kishore Shrivastava

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Code') against the order dated 19-12-2000 in M. J. C. No. 37 of 1996 of the 9th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur by which her application under Section 340 of the Code for prosecuting R. D. Agrawal, an Officer of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation for perjury punishable under Section 193, I. P. C. has been rejected.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF Kamalvasini Agrawal had instituted Civil Suit No. 150-A of 1995 for eviction of defendant-Hindustan Petroleum Corporation under Section 12 (1) (f) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 on the ground that the suit accommodation was bona fide required by her for carrying on her own business. That suit was decreed on 22-1-1996. During the pendency of that suit R. D. Agrawal, an Officer of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, was examined as a witness on behalf of the defendant. He deposed before the Court that : "there is a plot measuring 7000 sq. ft. behind the suit accommodation on which the construction can be carried out". According to the plaintiff this was a false statement made by non-applican










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top