SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 671

A.K.GOHIL
PHOOLSINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAVLA ALIAS BHAVALIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.GANGRADE, T.N.SINGH, Z.AHMAD KHAN

A. K. GOHIL, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant has filed this Civil Revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the interlocutory order dated 3-8-1999 passed in Civil Suit No. 58-A/95 by the Civil Judge, Class II, Bhikangaon, whereby the trial Court rejected the application of the plaintiff, I. A. No. 6 under Order XIII, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure and I. A. No. 7 under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act.

( 2 ) THIS civil revision was filed on 27-9-1999 and by order dated 23-2-2000 notices were directed to be issued and the proceedings of the trial Court were stayed. This civil revision came up for hearing on 1-7-2002. On the same day the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 (No. 46 of 1999) also came into force by notification dated 6th June, 2002. By Section 12 of this amendment of 1999 (No. 46 of 1999) in Section 115 of the Principal Act, the "proviso" of sub-section (1) has been substituted.

( 3 ) AFTER the enforcement of the amendment w. e. f. 1-7-2002 when this revision came up for hearing the learned counsel for Respondents raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of civil revision after the amendment and it was submitted that t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top