SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 628

DIPAK MISRA, AJIT SINGH
RAM DAYAL PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Bhoumik, A.K.Mishra, N.S.KALE, S.K.SETH

DIPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, a Municipal Councillor of the Municipal Corporation, Bhopal has prayed for declaration of Rule 3 (2) of Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (the Conduct of Business of the Mayor-in-Council/president-in-Council and the powers and Functions of the Authorities) Rules, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') as ultra vires the S. 37 of M. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (Act of 23 of 1956) (for brevity 'the Act') and further to quash the said Rule by issue of appropriate writ, order or direction.

( 2 ) THE facts exposited in the petition are that the petitioner is a Municipal Councillor of Bhopal Municipal Council. The State Government amended the act by the Madhya Pradesh Nagarpalik Vidhi (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1998 (Act No. 20 of 1998 ). By virtue of the said amendment S. 37 was substituted. The substituted provision deals with constitution of Mayor-in-Council. It is putforth in the petition that the State Government in exercise of power conferred by S. 37 of the amended Act has enacted the rule 3 which deals with the constitution of Mayor-in-Council and sub-rule (
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top