SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 837

S.L.JAIN
DADU ALIAS INDRAKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dinesh Joshi, Jagat Sher Singh

S. L. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant is challenging in this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, his conviction and the sentence awarded to him for the offence punishable under Section 25 (1) (b) of the Arms Act by Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur, vide impugned judgment and order dated 17-3-90 in Sessions Trial No. 200/89. A sentence of 1-1/2 years' R. I. and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default 3 months' R. I. was imposed on the appellant by the trial Court.

( 2 ) FACTS necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that the appellant was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act on the allegations that on 15-7-89 at about 2. 30 p. m. in village Panagar he fired a pistol to deceased Bhuri Kori when he was watching the movie in Jitendra Video Hall. On 19-7-89, appellant was arrested by P. W. 9, A. K. Jharkhedia, the Investigating Officer as per Ex. P. 11 and one 12 bore Katta (country made pistol) and 12 bore one cartridge were seized from his possession seizure memo Ex. P. 10.

( 3 ) THE prosecution failed to connect the appellant with the murder, hence learned trial Judge acquitted him
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top