U.N.SINGH
SHANTI DEVI AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
V. H. LULLA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order, deciding the Civil revision No. 83/2003 filed against an order dated 9-12-2002, in the case No. 2/2000-2001/90-7 passed by the Rent Controlling authority, Gwalior, allowing an application under Order 3, Rule 2 of the CPC (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') of the defendant seeking to reject the affidavit of the plaintiffs son, filed under Order 18, Rule 4 of the Code, on the strength of a power of attorney to that effect, shall also dispose of the Civil Revision No. 122/2003 which impugns an interim order dated 27-3-2003 in the same case, whereby the authority has recalled in part the order dated 9-12-2002 to correct a mistake of closing the plaintiffs evidence while deciding the question as to whether the plaintiffs son being the power of attorney holder was entitled to lead evidence on her behalf, by filing an affidavit.
( 2 ) IT is said that one Smt. Shanti Devi agarwal (hereinafter referred to as the 'plaintiff) filed an application under Sec. 23-A (a) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') against v. H. Lulla (hereinafter referred to as the 'defendant') for eviction from her house No. 17 (Municipal No.
Referred to : T. C. Mathai v. District and Sessions Judge
Tulsiram v. Bank of Maharashtra
Lai Durga Baksh Singh v. Rani Brij Raj Kuar
Indian Bank v. Satyam Fires (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Vijay Pre-Prathamik and Madhyamik Vidyalaya Shikshak Samiti v. Vijay Madhyamik Vidyalaya Samiti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.