SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 753

U.N.SINGH
SHANTI DEVI AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
V. H. LULLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.Naik, B.B.SHUKLA, Sumant Mishra

U. N. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS order, deciding the Civil revision No. 83/2003 filed against an order dated 9-12-2002, in the case No. 2/2000-2001/90-7 passed by the Rent Controlling authority, Gwalior, allowing an application under Order 3, Rule 2 of the CPC (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') of the defendant seeking to reject the affidavit of the plaintiffs son, filed under Order 18, Rule 4 of the Code, on the strength of a power of attorney to that effect, shall also dispose of the Civil Revision No. 122/2003 which impugns an interim order dated 27-3-2003 in the same case, whereby the authority has recalled in part the order dated 9-12-2002 to correct a mistake of closing the plaintiffs evidence while deciding the question as to whether the plaintiffs son being the power of attorney holder was entitled to lead evidence on her behalf, by filing an affidavit.

( 2 ) IT is said that one Smt. Shanti Devi agarwal (hereinafter referred to as the 'plaintiff) filed an application under Sec. 23-A (a) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') against v. H. Lulla (hereinafter referred to as the 'defendant') for eviction from her house No. 17 (Municipal No.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top