SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 319

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Virendra Kasliang Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ramkatoridevi Wd/O – Respondent


ORDER

S.P. Srivastava, J.

1. Felling aggrieved by the order passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Gwalior, directing the eviction of the tenant-applicant from the accommodation in dispute within two months subject to the payment of Rs. 7,800/- towards payment of rent for a period of two years, he has now approached this Court invoking its jurisdiction Under Section 23-E of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, seeking redress praying for reversal of the impugned order.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the tenant-applicant and the learned counsel representing the landlady-respondent and have also carefully perused the record.

3. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for disposal of this revision lie in a narrow compass. An application Under Section 23-A (b) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 was filed by the landlady-respondent on 25-3-1995 praying for recovery of the possession on eviction of the tenant-applicant from the accommodation in dispute which formed part of the residential house and had been let out for business purposes. The landlord has asserted that she was the owner of the accommodation in dispute which had been let out to the defenda

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top