R.S.GARG
AKHLAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this petition under S. 439 read with S. 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicants who have been arrested by the Police Mandideep in connection with Crime No. 227/98 for committing offences punishable under Ss. 467, 471, 478, 487 read with S. 109, I. P. C. and Ss. 34, 36 and 39 of M. P. Excise Act have prayed for grant of bail.
( 2 ) UNDISPUTEDLY, the accused persons were arrested on 27-12-1998 for transporting illicit liquor. The prosecution case is that the applicants in a tanker of Indian Oil Company which is generally used for carrying and transporting L. P. G. were transporting the liquor without any authority. The prosecution case is that the accused persons and others after forging certain documents used the same for transporting the liquor and as each of them was involved in commission of the crime, they were required to be arrested. Undisputedly, the accused persons were arrested on 27-12-1998. It is also not in dispute before me that up to 12-5-1999 i. e. the date of the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Raisen challan was not filed. At a request made by Shri Jain, learned counsel for the applicants, I enquired from the Sessi
Dr. B. S. Panchal v. State of Gujarat
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan
Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra
Rajnikant v. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau, New Delhi
Chaganti Satyanarayana v. State of A.P.
C.B.I. Special Investigation Cell-I v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
Raghubir Singh v. State of Bihar
State of U.P. v. Lakshmi Brahman
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.