D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
GUDDUBAI – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA KUMAR AWASTHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision of the complaint against the order dated 25. 8. 1990 passed by the Fourth Additional Judge to the Court of Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in Sessions Trail No. 50 of 1990 whereby no charge has been framed against Salim Khan, Station Officer, Hardalpur and instead framing charge under section 302 I. P. C. , charges only under section 304 Part-II and section 201 I. P. C. have been framed against other accused (Non-applicants No. 1 to 3)
( 2 ) THE present criminal case was instituted against the non-applicants on the allegation that one Pontu Dhimar was arrested by the police for interrogation on the charge of Commission of theft. According to the allegation of two other prisoners lodged in the police station, deceased Pontu was beaten up by non-applicant Nos. 1 to 4 who were employees in the staff of the police at the police station. The body of the deceased Pontu was recovered from a well and according to the medical opinion, he died of asphyxia.
( 3 ) THE learned counsel appearing for the complainant, who is widow of deceased Puntu, urged that the learned Judge of the trial Court instead of framing charge on the basis of the allegations c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.