P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
M. P. Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Shrivastava – Respondent
Sinha, J. -- 1. Leave granted.
2. The respondent was appointed on daily wages as a Sub-Engineer (Civil) on or about 7.4.1995. On the premise that his services may be terminated, he tiled a writ petition whereupon by an order dated 25.4.2000, the High Court directed the appellant Board to consider his case in the light of the purported circulars issued by the State Government for scrutiny of the daily rated employees. Upon the said direction, a scrutiny committee was appointed which found that there had been no vacancy nor there existed any sanctioned post. The Committee, prior to coming to the aforementioned opinion, gave an opportunity of hearing to the respondent He thereafter filed an application before the Labour Court purported to be in terms of section 31 (3) read with section 64A of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act. 1960 (for short "the 1960 Act") praying that he be classified in the permanent category on the ground that he had satisfactorily worked for more than six months and, thus, become eligible there for as provided under clause 2 (i) of the Standard Standing Orders. The Labour Court, by an order dated 22.1.2002, allowed the said application holding:
"
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.