S.K.GANGELE
Bashir – Appellant
Versus
Hussain Bana – Respondent
1. This is the non-applicant-petitioner revision filed u/s 23E of M.P. Accommodation Control Act (hereinafter called as 'the Act') against the order of eviction dated 10.7.2003 passed by the Rent Control Authority (hereinafter called 'as Authority') on an application filed by the applicant-respondent-landlady.
2. The landlady submitted before the Authority that suit house No. 8/2, Kadwghat, Indore was rented out to the petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs. 325/-, consisting of five rooms, two on first floor, 3 on ground floor, needed for herself and her family members, son Mohammad Iqubal and grandsons Chand Mohammad, Zia-ul-Hasan, granddaughter Shagufta Bano. She was residing in a small room at Kadwghat and her family members in a rented premises. Her two grandsons and granddaughter were schoolgoing children. She was old lady aged about 75 years, wanted to live with her family members in her own suit house. Her husband had died. Earlier she filed civil suit for eviction against the non-applicant which was dismissed in default on 13.2.2000.
3. The petitioner denied the pleadings of landlady and submitted that her need was not bona fide, she had sufficient accommodation, earlier al
1. Vimla Devi v. Dulichand = 1994(1) MPJR 144
3. Ram Prasad v. Hari Narain and others = [AIR 1998 Raj. 185]
5. Kaluram v. Gendalal = [1995(11) MPWN 43 at page 59]
8. Purushottam Umedbhai and Co. v. M/s. Manilal and sons = [AIR 1961 SC 325]
11. Tulsiram v. Bank of Maharashtra = [1985 MPWN 254]
12. Dharam Veer Sharma v. Bhagwati Prasad = [1998(1) MPJR 392]
13. Virendra Kasliang Sharim v. Smt. Ramkatori Devi = [1998(2) MPLJ 410]
14. N.R. Narayan Swamy v. B. Francis Jagan = [(2001) 6 SCC 473]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.