Kochar, J.--1. The appellants named above, being dissatisfied with the judgment dated 15.5.1995, rendered by the learned Third Addl. Sessions Judge, Shajapur in. S.T. No. 475/94, thereby finding the appellants guilty of the offences punishable under sections 302/34, 325/34 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, convicted and sentenced them each to suffer imprisonment for life with fine Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to suffer RI for three months, RI. for one year and fine Rs. 200/-, in default of payment whereof to suffer R.I. for two months and fine Rs. 100/-, in default of payment of fine to suffer RI. for one month respectively, have preferred this appeal. All the substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently.

2. The brief facts of the prosecution case as unfolded before the trial Court were that on 8.1.1992, complainant Shivlal lodged a report that about one and a half months before, there was a quarrel between him and Chandersingh and since then, their relations were strained. On the fateful night of 8.1.1992, the complainant alongwith Baldeo and Bapu were trying to sleep in their field. At that time, the appellants came over there armed with lathis and