SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 583

S.K.GANGELE
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Hariram – Respondent


Advocates:
Smt. Ami Prabal, Deputy Advocate General for petitioners;
B.P. Singh for respondent No.1.

ORDER

1. Petitioners have filed the petition challenging the orders Annexure P-1 dated 16.11.2007 and Annexure P-2 dated 17.8.2007 passed by the Industrial Court, Gwalior and Labour Court, Gwalior.

2. Initially the respondent-employee filed an application before the Labour Court under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act for his classification on the post of Chowkidar and also challenged the order of termination of service dated 4.7.1995. He pleaded that he had been working on daily wage basis as Chowkidar w.e.f. 1.7.1990. He completed six months' satisfactory service and was entitled to be classified on the post of Chowkidar. Contrary to this the department issued a notice dated 4.7.1995 terminating his services, which is illegal. The Labour Court vide order dated 4.7.2000 allowed the application of the respondent-employee and quashed the notice dated 4.7.1995 and also ordered classification of the employee from 24.7.1993 on the post of Chowkidar with payment of salary for the post w.e.f. 24.7.1993.

3. Petitioners filed an appeal against the aforesaid order, which was also dismissed by the Industrial Court vide order dated 23.4.2002. Thereafter, petitioners furth

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top