DIPAK MISRA
Sadan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of order dated 21.11.2001, Annexure P-4, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar, the respondent No.2 herein, in Revision Case No., 106-A-89/2001-2002 whereby he has stayed the order passed by the Additional Collector, Sagar in Case No. 2-A/8912001-2002.
2. The facts as have been uncurtained are that the petitioner is the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Bansiya Bardo, District Sagar. A 'Motion of No-Confidence' was initiated against the petitioner by some of the members of the said Gram Panchayat and the Naib Tahsildar, Circle Surkhi, District Sagar, the respondent No.6 herein, was'appointed as the Presiding Officer of the meeting which was scheduled to be held on 8.10.2001. The 'Motion of No-Confidence' was passed against the petitioner. The Prescribed Authority vide order dated 9.10.2001 contained in Annexure P-1 held that the 'Motion of No-Confidence' has been properly passed. The said order was assailed by the petitioner by raising a dispute under section 21 (4) o
1. Ramnath Kaushik v. Slate of Madhya Pradesh and others = [1999(1) JLJ 146
2. Kandhilal Patel and others v. State of M.P. and others = [1999(2) JLJ 109]
3. Bhulin Dewangan v. State of M.P. and others = [2000(2) JLJ 253 (FB)]
6. Ram Charan Ahirwar v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Jatara = [1998(2) JLJ 267
7. Gopaldas of Mandsaur v. Alihussain Kamarali and others = [1961 JLJ 450]
13. Jetha Bai and Sons v. M/s. Sunderdas Rathenai = [AIR 1988 SC 812]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.