1. This petition challenges the order Annexure P/1 dated 29.8.1997 passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur, in Case No. 40-B/128-96-97 under the provisions of section 91 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the' Act), by which the no-confidence motion has been held to have been duly passed against the petitioner. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Semra as also the order Annexure P/2 passed by the Additional Commissioner in appeal under Rule 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 affirming the said order Annexure P/1 and further seeks a declaration to the effect that the no-confidence motion moved against the petitioner has failed. The petitioner was the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Semra. A notice for moving a motion of no-confidence, against the petitioner, was given to Prescribed Authority and the Prescribed Authority, therefore, fixed 10.5.97, as the date for the meeting, to consider the motion as required by Rule 3 of the "Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarparich, Janapad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niya