DIPAK MISRA
Hariwat Tekam – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Sustainability of the notice dated 21.9.2001, Annexure A-7, issued by the Chief Executive ,Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mehandwani, respondent No.4, herein, has been called in question in this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the same. There is further prayer for issuance of direction for detail enquiry to be conducted in relation to the selection process of contract teachers by any in dependant authority and to pass such other order/direction as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Facts as have been depicted in the writ petition are that the petitioner was elected as President of Janpad Panchayat, Mahendwani, Dindori. The respondent No 3 was elected as Vice President of the said Janpad Panchayat. Certain assertion have been made with regard to election and appointment of contract teachers which need not be referred to for the purpose of present writ petition in as much as the seminal issue that arises for consideration in this petition is whether the issuance of notice contained in Annexure A-7 fixing the date for no-confidence moti
2. Narasimhaiah v. H.C. Singri Gowda
3. Narayan Das Sharma v. State of M.P. and others
4. Bhulin Dewangan v. State of M.P. and others = 2000(2) JLJ 253
5. Union India v. Jankiraman = (1991) 4 SCC 109
6. Ajit Singh v. Nagar Panchayat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.