A.K.MATHUR, DIPAK MISRA
Shanti Devi Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
Mathur, C.J. -- 1. This is a reference made by the learned single Judge holding that the question raised in the First Appeal is of an importance; therefore, it may be decided by the Division Bench, though the question of law has not been framed by the learned single Judge. However, whenever question is referred to the Larger Bench, question of law should be framed and then it should be referred to the Larger Bench. Since the question of law was not framed by the learned Single Judge, we shall frame a proper question. after narration of few necessary facts.
2. A suit was filed by the plaintiffs/appellants. There is a house existing on plot No. 8/1 and 9 measuring 400 sq. ft. The suit premises was rented out by the plaintiffs to the defendant-Bank on monthly rent of Rs. 4537.50 paise. The suit premises was previously owned by Bhagwanji Amarsi Chatwani and thereafter, the suit premises were purchased by the plaintiffs. It is alleged that the plaintiffs required the suit premises in order to start their business.
3. The suit was resisted by the defendant-Bank. It is alleged that the suit premises originally belonged to one Swami Bhagwanji Amarsi and it was rented out by him to the B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.