MISS USHA SHUKLA
Yadhisthir Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This petition under section 482 CrPC has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the proceedings pending before S.D.M. Raipurunder sections 145 and 146 CrPC. ....
2. Petitioner Yudhisthirlal is a partner in the Firm Sadaqi Builders of Raipur. The firm has undertaken a multicrore project for construction of 500 shops in village Boriyakala, Police Station Mana camp in Raipur District. The builder availed of the services of M/s. Begraj Agarwal contractor firm, for construction of some of these shops on agreed terms• and conditions. The contract of construction was reduced into writing on 19.12.94. In pursuance of this agreement respondent No.2 started construction work from 19.12.94. These facts are not in dispute.
3. It is further admitted that the contractor respondent No.2 stopped the construction work in the middle, raising dispute about payment, complaints were made to the police and eventually Station House Officer, Police Station Mana Camp, filed a report along with statements and other documents before S.D.M. Raipur. Proceedings under section•145 CrPC were thus initiated and on the very same day, order under section 146 CrPC was also passed for attachment of 280 shops
3. Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra = (AIR 1978 SC 47)
5. GovindDasBiyaniv. Badri Narayan Rathi = (1995 JLJ231
6. Allen Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India = (1994 MPLJ 247)
8. Meghraj Singh v. Devidas = (1976 JLJ 567)
2. Dharampal and others v. Smt. Ramshri and others = [1993 (1) MPWN 85
7. S.R. Srinivas Thathachariar; v. Pitchai Muthu Mo pan and others = (1972 CrLJ 287)
9. Anamallai Club v. Governmentrof T.N. and others = [(1997) 3 SCC 169]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.