SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(MP) 521

T.N.SINGH, SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI
Purushottam Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Madhukar Rao for petitioner; N.P. Mittal for respondents.

ORDER

Dr. T.N. Singh, J. -- - 1. In this Writ Petition, the life sentence passed on 11.7.1986 by the 'General Court Martial which assembled at Gwalior on 24.5.1986 is challenged by the convict who was tried for committing the civil offence of murder contrary to section 302, IPC. He is also dismissed from service. After pronouncing the sentence, "recommendation to mercy" was pari passu made -- "the accused may not be made to undergo the full term of the sentence". The confirmation of sentence by G.O.C. 36 Infantry Division (Respondent No. 3) is also challenged.

2. A chequered career this petition has had in this Court and about that, few words we must say. Hearing was piecemeal, on different dates, on and from 7.1.1992. It concluded on 21.2.1992 when order was reserved. In the cause of preparation of the judgment, we faced some difficulty in dealing with the main contention based on section 79, IPC. We found materials available to us insufficient to deal with the plea because from the "Summary of Evidence" recorded under section 23 of the Army Rules we found new vistas of arguments opened to press the plea on the basis also of Rules 24, 28 and 35 of the Army Rules. We accordingly orde
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top