SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 381

T.N.SINGH, SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI
Mahesh Chandra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.D. Jain for petitioner; S.B. Mishra, Government Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

Dr. T.N. Singh, J. -- 1. Petitioner was registered as A-II Class Contractor in the Irrigation Department on 4.10.1985. His registration is valid for five years. He had done some work for the Department and in that connection, he raised a "dispute" claiming Rs.3,60,214/- from the Department by way of a reference made to the Tribunal constituted under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, for short, 'the Adhiniyam'. He did not pay the requisite court-fee, but made an application that he be treated as an indigent person and allowed to pursue the reference application without payment of court-fee. By order dated 10.7.1990, his prayer being rejected by the Tribunal, he has challenged that order before us on the writ side.

2. Although in the impugned order, the Tribunal has found that the applicant/petitioner was possessed of sufficient means to pay the requisite court-fee of Rs.11,942/-, in this Court, the legal plea forcefully pressed by Government Advocate, Shri S.B. Mishra, is that provisions of order 33, CPC being not applicable to the proceedings before the Tribunal and otherwise too, there being no inherent jurisdiction vested in that forum to entertain a






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top