SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 98

S.AWASTHY
Khuman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nathuram – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N. Agarwal for appellant; K.L. Issrani for respondent.

JUDGMENT

S. Awasthy, J. -- 1. This appeal arises against the judgment and decree dated 18.7.1986 passed in Civil Appeal No. 62-A of 1983 by th6 4th Additional Judge to the Court of the District Judge, Jabalpur arising out of the judgment and decree dated 18.8.1983 passed in Civil Suit No. 15-A of 1982 by the 11th Civil Judge, Class-II, Jabalpur.

2. The plaintiff-respondent pleaded that he purchased house No. 221, Gokalpur from one Umashankar Pandey vide registered sale-deed dated 5.3.1976. He claimed rent at the rate of Rs. 15/- per month from the date of purchase vide notice dated 21.4.76 which was served on the appellant on 3.8.76. The rent was not paid within 2 months of the service of notice, hence a ground under section 12(1)(a) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') accrued to him. He had purchased the house for the purpose of residence of himself and his family members. He has no other suitable residential accommodation in Jabalpur town, hence a ground under section 12(1)(e) of the Act accrued in his favour. The defendant has denied the title of the plaintiff in his written statement, hence ground under section 12(1)(c) of the Act also a




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top