U.L.BHAT, M.V.TAMASKAR, R.P.AWASTHY
Saroj Bai – Appellant
Versus
Jai Kumar Jain – Respondent
U.L. Bhat, C.J. -- 1. Petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 346 of 1994, (who is a respondent in M.Cr.C. No. 3162 of 1994) is the wife of the respondent therein, who is the petitioner in M.Cr.C. No. 3162 of 1994. In 1982, the wife filed an application under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the Code) seeking an order directing the husband to pay her maintenance allowance of Rs. 200/- per month, alleging that though he has means to maintain her, he has neglected to do so. The husband denied that she was entitled to separate maintenance. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raghogarh, on consideration of evidence passed an order on 13.4.1987, allowing the application and directing the husband to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 200/- per month from 19.1.1982, the date of application till December 1986. The husband filed revision in the Sessions Court, Guna which allowed the revision in part, reducing the quantum of maintenance from Rs. 200/- to Rs. 50/- per month. The wife aggrieved by the reduction in the rate of maintenance has filed the revision and the husband, being aggrieved by the direction requiring him to pay maintenance from the date of app
7. Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Mrs. Veena Kaushal and others = [AIR 1978 SC 1807]
1. Lachhamani v. Ramu = [(1983 Crimes 590
5. Krishna v. Dharamraj = [1991 JLJ 405
8. Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum = [1985 JLJ 489
2. Mohd. Inayat Vila Khan v. Salam Banu = [M.Cr.C. No. 97 of 1983, 1985 MPWN 365
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.