DIPAK MISRA
Saluja Constructions – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
( 1. ) IN this writ petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has called in question the defensibility of the order dated 21-8-2001, Annexure P-1, passed by the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal, Bhopal (in short the Tribunal) whereby the Tribunal has issued directions to the petitioner to pay the respondents-State a sum of Rs. 6,50,000/- along with interest and has also issued certain further ancillary directions.
( 2. ) THE facts as have been adumbrated in the writ petition are that the petitioner instituted a Reference Case No. 104/89 before the Tribunal under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) whereby the Tribunal vide order dated 7-9-1995 passed an award in favour of the petitioner for grant of Rs. 11,79,166/-which included the claim of overhead charges of Rs. 6 lakhs and loss on profit of Rs. 50,000/ -. Against the said award the petitioner preferred a Civil Revision No. 2136/95 before this Court. In the civil revision this Court vide order dated 7-9-1999 remanded the matter to the Tribunal with certain guidelines. In the meantime, the petitioner in executi
Jai Berham v. Kedar Nath Marwari
UNION OF INDIA Vs PARAS LAMINATES (P) LIMITED
Woolwich Equoitable Building Society v. Inland Revenue Commissioner
LAL BHAGWANT SINGH Vs RAI SAHIB LALA SRI KISHEN DAS
BINAYAK SWAIN Vs Ramesh Chandra Panigrahi,another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.