SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 1024

S.P.KHARE
Shahista Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mukhtar Ahmad, Kiran Mehta, Umesh Trivedi

Judgment

S.P.Khare, J.

( 1. ) This is a revision by the plaintiff against the order by which she has been directed to pay ad valorem Court fee on Rs. 2,61,922/-.

( 2. ) The plaintiff is widow of Sheikh Wahab and defendant No. 4 Sheikh Mehboob is his father. Sheikh Wahab was a school teacher in a Government School in Paraswara Block. He died pn 20.5.1999. A sum of Rs. 2,61,922/- is payable by the Government as death-cum- retirement dues. The plaintiff claims that he had nominated her during his life time to receive these dues in the event of his death; he had done so as per Government rules and therefore she alone is entitled to the said amount. The defendant No. 4 submitted an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of the succession certificate. The plaintiff also submitted an application for the same purpose. An order was passed on 7-8-2000 for grant of succession certificate in respect of l/4th amount in favour of the plaintiff and for 3/4th amount in favour of the defendant No. 4 as per Muslim Law of inheritence. That order was maintained in appeal also. The plaintiff filed a revision against that order. That was also dismissed with an observation that







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top