SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 372

K.K.LAHOTI, S.P.KHARE, S.K.KULSHRESTHA
Shrish Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK AGARWAL, S.K.SETH,

Judgment

( 1. ) THE question which arises for determination by the Full Bench in the present case is: "whether Sections 47-A to 47-D of the M. P. Excise Act, 1915 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) are Constitutionally valid ?

( 2. ) THE M. P. Excise Act, 1915 has been amended by the M. P. Excise (Amendment) Act, 2000 (Act No. 22 of 2000) which has come into force from 1-12-2000. The penal provision in Section 34 has been made more condign and deterrent if a person is convicted for an offence for manufacture, transport, import, export, collection, possession and sale of intoxicant if the quantity of the intoxicant being liquor found at the time or in the course of detection of the offence exceeds fifty bulk litres. In such a case as provided in Sub-section (2) he will be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to three years and with fine which shall not be less than twenty five thousand rupees but may extend to one lac rupees. Sub-section (3) provides that when an offence covered by Clause (a) or Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) is committed and the quantity of liquor found at the time or in the course of detection of s

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top